Tag Archives: abortion

No Woodchucks

“I became a physician in order to help save lives. I am at once a physician, a citizen, and a woman, and I am not willing to stand aside and allow the concept of expendable human lives to turn this great land of ours into just another exclusive reservation where only the perfect, the privileged, and the planned have the right to live.” Dr. Mildred Jefferson[i]

Regular readers may remember Weaver Cove Boat Landing, a nearby frequent sunset stop for Rita and me[ii]. On the road in, last summer we were greeted often on a small hillock next to the railroad crossing by two families of woodchucks. Mothers, fathers, and pups. Watchful and wary, the adults would bark when we got close, and the young ones would dive into the brush and the safety of their dens. We monitored their progress and growth. Woodchuck pups grazing on the fresh spring grass are cute, and a passel of the large ground squirrels is entertaining. Lumbering awkwardly, yet quickly when necessary, they are somehow encouraging, life in one of its myriad varieties.

The ospreys still nest and hunt there. The various species of gulls, terns, and ducks are abundant. Canadian geese summer at the cove. But this year and not for lack of looking for them, we have seen only one lonely woodchuck, and he was a gray whiskered grizzled veteran. Only once, and not again at the edge of the bushes. I wonder where they went. Coyotes? Woodchuck failed relationships? Did the neighborhood get too expensive? Too many trains? One old remaining woodchuck who looked around in the spring, spied no eligible woodchuck beauties, got discouraged, retreated to one of his tunnels and pulled the dirt in behind him?  We will probably never know, but I miss the woodchucks.

A friendly knoll devoid of woodchuck pups is a momentary deprivation; they are hardly an endangered species[iii].

A country well below our population replacement rate and increasingly devoid of young human pups is entirely a different matter.

One tragedy that Mildred Jefferson understood well is the misconception that terminating babies liberates women. The truly liberated are three generations of irresponsible sperm donors who have increasingly laid off the responsibility for their libidos and the resulting pregnancies on women. “Pregnancy was not what I signed up for, honey. Either the kid goes, or I do,” is the tragic refrain of far too many postmodern boys who fail the opportunity to be men. Rita and I have been involved in helping many women facing just this awful choice for nearly fifty years.

“My angel in distress

You look OK to me

I’ll send you my address

When I know what it will be

I could easily stay with you

On your side of heaven’s door

‘Cause I don’t love you any less

But I can’t love you anymore.”   Lyle Lovett, “I Can’t Love You Anymore”

Far too large a topic for a blog post, but we can look at one major contributor to the dearth of babies in our country and in many others.

Pre-born infant “termination” and lies have are frequent allies. The narrative that legal abortion alleviates more heartbreak than it creates is a commonly accepted truism that rings increasingly hollow.

Just one example (and there are many others[iv]): the New York Times (yes, that New York Times) recently ran an expose of carelessness, unsanitary conditions and danger to patients at Planned Parenthood. I invite you to read the full article if you get past the paywall and form your own opinion: Botched Care and Tired Staff: Planned Parenthood in Crisis. Here are some relevant quotes: “In a case settled in California last year, a woman accused the organization of improperly implanting a birth control device in her arm and causing nerve damage.” “A Nebraska clinician in 2022 did not realize that a woman was four months pregnant when she inserted an IUD. Several hours later, the patient was rushed to an emergency room and gave birth to a stillborn fetus.” “For months last year at the North Central States affiliate, which oversees the Nebraska clinic, an understaffed nursing department did not upload sexually transmitted infection test results into charts, and patients wrongly believed that their results were negative when they did not hear back.” “Many clinics are in dire need of upgrades and repairs. In Omaha last year, sewage from a backed-up toilet seeped into the abortion recovery room for two days, according to interviews with staff members..”

The Times article finds underfunding, underpaid staff, high turnover, and poorly trained staff responsible. Perhaps there is an underlying and more pernicious explanation.

Planned Parenthood is a business and not a healthcare clinic[v]. The many ethical and legal violations are well documented. Planned Parenthood consists of forty nine semi-independent affiliates each with their own CEO. The average pay for those executives based on the local affiliate’s income was $352,661 in 2023, the last full year reports were filed. The highest is Sue Dunlap in Los Angeles. Sue pulled down a lucrative $875,942 in total compensation. Not a bad job. Neither is the top job at the mother ship.  National President and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson was paid $904,014.

In some states local law for political reasons exempts Planned Parenthood and other abortion businesses from the mandated health inspections[vi] that keep real health care clinics clean, safe, and professional, or local authorities are less inclined to enforce the regulations that do exist for politically ‘sensitive’ businesses.  Efforts by some states to mandate that physicians perpetrating these procedures must be granted admitting privileges to local hospital have been stopped in the courts so far. Too much of a burden on a woman’s right, etc. A doctor can fly in from another state, whack out a few late term abortions and fly home with impunity, especially if their home state has passed laws shielding them from liability.

The abortion industry regulations and their enforcement are heavily influenced by money, politics and ideology, not just medical prudence and common sense.

“How many deaths were we talking about when abortion was illegal? In NARAL, we always said “5,000 to 10,000 deaths a year.” I confess that I knew the figures were totally false, and I suppose the others did too if they stopped to think of it. But in the “morality” of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics?”  Dr. Bernard Nathanson, co-founder of NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League). Dr. Nathanson, who later became an outspoken abortion opponent, presided over 60,000 abortions and performed over 5,000 personally.

The false narrative of thousands of maternal deaths from back alley abortions to support the original Roe v Wade decision has been debunked many times, most notably by Dr. Nathanson who helped make the statistics up to “document” his case when he was one of the most vocal advocates for legal abortion. The actual number of women who died from illegal abortions prior to Roe was estimated to be under a 100 per year for the nation. 87% of ‘back alley’ illegal abortions were committed by doctors in medical facilities or hospitals. The common meme of unsanitary knitting needles, brutal coat hangers, and bloody kitchen tables were emotional appeals to support pro-abortion advocacy.  Did such horror occur? Most likely. But they were the rare exception, not the norm. Not even close. [vii]

Lies and the abortion lobby have long been close companions. The ongoing controversy regarding the high risk of chemical abortions without adequate supervision and follow up has yet to be resolved. It is another instance of politics and ideology affecting science and medicine.

 A recent largest ever study from insurance company data[viii] found that in just under 11% of chemical abortions, women develop serious and even life threatening side effects requiring emergency room care or hospitalization. That’s 22 times more often than the FDA publishes for injuries caused by chemical abortions. Incomplete abortions, ectopic pregnancies, extensive bleeding, infections, sepsis, necessary surgery to complete the abortion, and cardiac or thrombosis problems were among the treated conditions.

Worsening the risks to women are the laxity of regulations in the use of these pills. When initially approved in an expedited, conditional process by the FDA during the Clinton administration, restrictions for safety and medical oversight were included: at least three office visits, prescribed only by a physician, no pregnancy past seven weeks, pills must be dispensed and taken only in the doctor’s office with a preliminary exam, observation and follow up, and adverse effects must be reported. Regulations were loosened progressively during the Obama administration and again under Joe Biden. The limit was pushed to ten weeks gestation and none of the above apply. At ten weeks, the woman could expel a tiny, but recognizable baby into a toilet or on the sheets and be left to deal with that on her own. Mail order drugs ordered over the phone with no physician required and no office visits are approved are the current almost negligible requirements. There is pressure from the pharmaceutical industry and the abortion lobby to make them available over the counter.

When politics and profits determine medical practice, what could go wrong?

*******************

And yet, I remain hopeful. Perhaps reason and prudence will eventually regain their rightful place. And life will again be protected. Life will again be cherished. Life will again be loved as our most precious gift. Abundant life will prevail.

“What’s lost is nothing to what’s found, and all the death that ever was, set next to life, would scarcely fill a cup.”  Frederick Buechner, “Godric”

[i][i] Dr. Jefferson became a personal friend prior to her death fourteen years ago.  A wonder and unique. Here’s an old post with some background: https://quovadisblog.net/2013/01/20/millie-and-a-fortieth-anniversary/

[ii] Here’s three. There may be more:  Unsung Heros of Civilization –  Selvage –  Summer’s End

[iii] We once enjoyed woodchuck stew at the home of some farmer friends. Woodchucks (alternately called groundhogs) are a damaging pest to vegetable gardens. Our friend would shoot them out of his garden, and since they are clean herbivores, they are good healthy eating like rabbits.

[iv] A second egregious example is a pending lawsuit from a woman who underwent an abortion in Illinois. After being put off several times by the doctor when she called to complain of excruciating post op pain and being told to take laxatives and Tylenol, she went to an emergency room. The competent doctors there performed emergency surgery and saved her life. They discovered a perforated uterus and almost 2/3 of a dismembered baby that had infiltrated into her abdominal cavity through the hole in her uterus. Another few days would have left her with sepsis and life threatening infection. Don’t read this on an empty stomach.

[v] An argument should be made that in abortion facilities where more than half the humans entering the doors end up dead is not health care.

[vi] Connecticut is one. So is Oregon. Other states use different rules for the inspections than surgical outpatient clinics follow.

[vii] https://www.hli.org/resources/doesnt-legal-abortion-save-women-filthy-back-alley-abortion-mills/

[viii] https://eppc.org/stop-harming-women/

2 Comments

Filed under Background Perspective

Viability

“Whatever else anything is, it ought to begin by being personal.”  Kathleen to Joe (Meg Ryan to Tom Hanks) in “You’ve Got Mail.

chicken or eggA friend told us recently about this meme on Facebook with a simple picture of an egg and the caption, “In Alabama, this is a chicken.”[i] A spirited discussion ensued with some friends about the controversial Alabama Supreme Court decision concerning the nature of embryos and the ethics of ‘in vitro’ fertilization (IVF)[ii].

This led to another friend reminding us of a story from 1979 in nearby Newport that was covered extensively in local news. We were living in Maine at the time and were unaware of the tragedy. A woman she knows well was rear ended in her car. She survived, but her baby was killed. The baby was still in utero, and the mom was within a few days of her due date nine months into her pregnancy. The controversy ensued when the devastated woman pursued the case as a wrongful death caused by vehicular homicide. After a wrenching public trial, the driver of the other car that caused the death was found innocent of that charge, not because he didn’t cause the accident, but because the baby in the mom’s womb according to the court did not meet the requirements to be protected as a human being.

At issue in both controversies is “when does a human being qualify as a human being deserving of the protection of law all of us enjoy and count upon?” Science is clear and uncontroversial in every embryology textbook in every medical school: at conception, a new human is created, with a complete genome unique in all of history. When the sperm’s DNA merges with the DNA of the egg, the resulting zygote contains within itself all that is necessary to produce first the zygote, then the blastocyst, then the embryo, then the baby (or fetus, which just means ‘little one’.)[iii] Thus is initiated the biological wonder of an unbroken continuum that does not cease maturing for the rest of her life.[iv]

Viability means “ability to live,” the root of which, derives from the Latin “vita,” which means life. “Vita” is the same root of many other English words like “vital,” vivacious,” “vitamin,” “revive,” and “survive.” The connotation ascribed to viability in a fetus is one that can survive outside the womb. This connotation is arbitrary as a legal status. No newborn infant can long survive without continued nurture and protection, a fact well known in ancient Rome where unwelcome or imperfect infants were exposed on a rock to die. An infant is viable, so is the preborn baby.  So is the zygote, the blastocyst, and the embryo – viable within the protection and nurture of a woman’s womb – but viable, nonetheless. The continuum of every life, if uninterrupted by disease or mishap or violence is built into the first instant of the creation of the new genome and cell.

Viability outside the womb is the line many have decided to draw concerning when a fetus is a human, a line coming increasingly earlier in a pregnancy.  A baby born at 22 weeks gestation or 18 weeks early at 14 ounces has survived birth and prospered[v] into toddlerhood. Why not make heartbeat or the pulsing of heart tissue the standard? Or implantation of the placenta in the wall of the uterus? Or “quickening?”  Or birth? Or, as some have proposed, such as Dr. Peter Singer, three months after birth? All have their merits and devotees. For that matter, why is vivaciousness off the table? We all like cute babies. Maybe only cute babies are human?  

The whole debate is arbitrary, a philosophical and ethical debate, not a scientific question, which is askedMildred Jefferson quote 1 and answered by the science of embryology. Advancing technology has provided another compelling proof, the visual, emotional confirmation of ultrasound images, which have in many ways changed the discussion. No one ever looked at the live images of a developing human being in their womb and thought, “This is a fetus made up of ‘meat Legos’** or an undifferentiated clump of tissue with which (because I have the power), I can do anything I want.” No, no – they put the images up on their refrigerator with magnets in wonder and joy. This is my baby.

The debate grows ever more bitter and emotional, and no court decision or legislation is going to settle the matter definitively. The public debate is mirrored internally in every human heart and mind, and it is there it will be settled for society. But there is an objective truth with which every conscience must contend. And everyone knows it.

“I shall be telling this with a sigh

Somewhere ages and ages hence:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.” Robert Frost, “The Road Not Taken”

Human beings don’t have reproductive systems: we each have half a reproductive system. One half of cell-flashhumans are female. One half are male. Science informs us in the instant a human sperm enters a human egg, there is a flash of light, and in 2016, a lab in Northwestern University filmed it, something to do with the zinc released from the egg.[vi] That flash occurs once in every human life and signals the very beginning of a life that a few hours later when the DNA merges contains all the genetic information necessary to create and develop our mature form. Every tiny increment along our way is human life.

An old series of memes tells us that no one has ever been heard to say on their deathbed that they wished they had spent more time at work (or watching television or death scrolling TikTok). I suggest as an analogue a series of questions each one of us will ask. Or should.

  • Do we want to treat life as a commodity to be frozen, collected, and selected for gender or eye color or possible defect? Or is it our obligation to respect the embryo as a unique and natural to be expected consequence of the total self-giving and loving act between a man and a woman committed for life to one another?[vii] Between a lab or a wedding bed?
  • In the case of abortion, do we choose a nursery or a medical waste bucket? A swaddling cloth or stainless steel? Nurture or disposal?
  • Do we want to objectify human life or treasure it as precious?
  • Do we want to base our decisions on fear, pure self intersest, and despair or hope, self sacrifice, and love?
  • Do we want to be givers of life or bringers of death?

In this context, where do we, (you and I), draw the line between when life is cherished, protected, and nurtured and when it can be discarded as imperfect, too expensive, too frightening, too disruptive, too damn inconvenient?  

Where do you draw the line?  Where do you come down – at how many weeks gestation or stage of development along the continuum? Then each of us needs to justify that position and understand why we hold it.

For me, the known science is sufficient. Not what the social and entertainment media and our culture inculcate in us, but what reason and conscience tells us is true.

It seems to me these are important questions. Not to be given a cursory dismissal with a cutesy, superficially clever meme, trivializing what is solemnly important and redefining anthropology – what it means to be a human being. We owe to ourselves an honest appraisal of what we believe, and why.

“I became a physician in order to help save lives. I am at once a physician, a citizen, and a woman, and I am not willing to stand aside and allow the concept of expendable human lives to turn this great land of ours into just another exclusive reservation where only the perfect, the privileged, and the planned have the right to live.”  Dr. Mildred Jefferson, mentor and much missed friend.

 

** “Meat legos” is a creative term from Mary Harrington’s blog and her post here in the Reactionary Feminist. She coined the descriptive “meat Legos matrix” as a name for that aspect of our destructive  postmodern culture of radical self invention wherein we harbor an unjustified or delusional optimism that through technology we can enjoy complete freedom to be almost anything, including treating our bodies as disembodied objects of our imagination. The term has gained great currency in the two years since she invented it. “Meat Legos” graphically recognizes an unprecendented shift in human anthropology uhheard of for all of history and calls into question all our basic assumptions about what a human being is, what our purpose is, and the nature of the mind/body synthesis. 

 

[i] The meme is wrong on many levels. One of them is that an egg or a chicken is not a human being, which is profoundly different. A non-fertilized egg is breakfast. A fertilized egg is a future Sunday dinner.

[ii] The case was a wrongful death civil suit filed by a couple who had preserved frozen “spare” embryos at the IVF clinic they had used. The embryos were destroyed by another disturbed patient who broke into the clinic’s freezer and pulled out a handful produced by the couple who sued him. Burning his hand on the cryogenically frozen embryos, he dropped them, and they were killed. The court found that frozen embryos were human and qualified the case as a wrongful death suit and negligent homicide. The case was not about whether IVF was licit, but about the nature of a human embryo.

[iii] “The best single sperm moves inside the egg and a zygote is formed,” says Dr. Richlin. The zygote phase lasts for around four days; it eventually turns into a blastocyst, and then an embryo.” (From: https://www.parents.com/what-is-a-zygote-7112279#)

[iv] Excellent animated video on fetal development from fertilization to birth: https://babyolivia.liveaction.org/ or some more detailed information here:  https://www.britannica.com/video/192622/Human-embryonic-development-birth-fertilization

[v] One of several articles about this baby: https://www.businessinsider.com/baby-born-at-22-weeks-weighed-14-ounces-2022-8#

[vi] https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-just-captured-the-actual-flash-of-light-that-sparks-when-sperm-meets-an-egg

[vii] What is the nature of the act? What is its telos or purpose? Unitive and procreative or purely recreational?  Should a pro choice understanding come earlier in the proceedings? Is there a responsibility in choosing to participate in the baby making act?

5 Comments

Filed under Culture views

Big Waves Break Twice

“And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ’round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?” as spoken by St. Thomas More, “Man for All Seasons,” Robert Bolt

Sachuest Beach Surfers endRita and I will often walk Sachuest Beach. Sometimes we sit at Surfer End and pray or watch the surfers or the waves on a smaller wave day. We have been transfixed watching them build with the wind far out into the bay. As they approach the shore, the larger ones will break twice: once about fifty feet out and a second time when gravity again overcomes momentum and the top curls over very near shore.

Thousands of gallons cascade over suddenly with a noticeable thump that can be heard and felt up on the seawall. Why anyone would ever bring a sound maker to a beach has always been a mystery to me. Just the waves please. Breaking. Breaking. For a million years.

Recently the big ones breaking twice set me thinking about Brown v Board of Education and the more recent Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. Both were big waves that broke twice.

“To separate children from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.” Chief Justice Earl Warren about Brown v Board of Education

In 1954 Brown v Board of Education overturned Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 that enforced separate but equal segregation, zealously guarded practices mostly in the South. For fifty-eight years, segregation held sway. Separate facilities for black folks: lunch counters, bus seats, restrooms, hotel accommodations, sports teams, and most damningly, schools.

In Plessy, the Court held that “separate but equal” satisfied the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment. But “separate but equal” was separate only.  Equal was a far piece off. In Brown, justice finally prevailed.

A quick and just overturning of a gravely mistaken Supreme Court decision half a century ago, and all was set right overnight. Not exactly. The wave breaks twice. Those of us of an age will never forget the interim.

For the next decade or more, the battle raged with the Federal government stepping in many times to enforce integrated facilities when the various states refused to comply. Democrats pushed hard back for many years to sustain the old “Jim Crow” laws that stifled opportunities for minorities. Opportunities to ride at the front of the bus, opportunities to drink from the same water fountain, opportunities to eat at the same counter in the cafeteria or restaurant, opportunities to an equal education in the same school or college as white kids. Blood was shed. Dr. Martin Luther King and others were shot, hung, burned, and martyred to the cause of equality of rights and opportunity. “We Shall Overcome” was sung by Joan Baez on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and on the march to Selma, Alabama with Dr. King and became an anthem most of us knew well. The “I Have a Dream” speech on the Lincoln Memorial steps in 1963 can still bring chills almost another sixty years later.

The wave breaks twice, and it’s a brutal turmoil under the swelling surface.

“Like the infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, Roe was also egregiously wrong and on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided. We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision…” Majority opinion in Dobbs v Jackson

As it was with Plessy, so it is with Roe. A gravely flawed decision from nearly fifty years before was justly undone. The second break is building. The segregationists brought out the dogs. The abortion lobby and their political allies are hard at it now with different dogs. This time many states are passing laws and trying to protect those who have no voice, while the Feds are working for the abortion lobby. The Feds have largely ignored almost two hundred attacks on churches and crisis pregnancy centers from vandalism to fire-bombing since the preliminary Dobbs decision was illegally leaked to a complicit press.[i] Those praying and holding signs at abortion clinics have not been so lucky. For them, it’s been predawn arrests in front of their families by heavily armed Department of Justice and FBI storm troopers.[ii] The confusion, draconian policies, and rhetoric we read and see every day is the interim as it was in those fifteen years following Brown v Board of Education. For us, it’s just the beginning.

Perhaps at some future point, a case will be adjudicated about the personhood of the pre-born human being. The science of embryology is settled without exception about the human nature of the fetus with her unique and complete genome. The sticking point is ideological and philosophical, not scientific. When does a developing human being gain the protection as persons under the law? When in the continuum of human development should the dividing line between life and extinction be drawn? Or do we simply ‘follow the science’ and protect innocent human life during its most vulnerable period from the start?

“The person—especially a woman—may be disillusioned by the fact that over time a man’s affection turns out to be only, so to speak, a cover for desire or even for an explicit will to use. Both a woman and a man may be disillusioned by the fact that the values attributed to the beloved person turn out to be fiction. Because of the dissonance between the ideal and the reality, affective love is sometimes not only extinguished but even transformed into affective hatred.” – Karol Wojtyla, Love and Responsibility

The false binding of abortion to the freedom of women has made this discussion most knotty. Once the argument is framed as chattel or forced pregnancy, the humanity of the fetus is quickly pushed to the back of the bus.

What if we considered the discussion from the other side of the mirror, a changed vantage point? What if the sexual revolution has brought about a new type of enslavement for women? Perhaps if men were held accountable more explicitly for their participation in the baby making act, this deeper joint responsibility would allow the developing human to become once again hallowed and an invitation to nurturing, not destruction. Three generations of aggressive and irresponsible sperm donors have risen like specters from the sexual revolution. Women, rather than gaining freedom, are held primarily responsible for an unplanned pregnancy[iii]. The hook up culture assumes hooking up as an expectation, but if the baby making act makes a baby, well, the mom better take care of things because she blew the protection, right? And the kid is thrown into the soul blasted bargain.

Section 17 of Pope St Paul VI’s famous (or infamous according to your light) “Humanae Vitae” accurately foretold the predictable outcome of ubiquitous contraception as a proposed solution to this changed expectation, unprecedented in the history of our culture as a norm. “Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.”

One-night stands or a few weeks hook up became far too common, and the surrounding “with care and affection” often was a forgotten victim, along with the baby. Has this been a ‘freedom’ or an impoverishment for women? Does any woman, no matter how frightened and abandoned and alone, in her heart of hearts want to destroy the baby in her womb?

The momentum shift jerked the culture off its center of gravity, and the tilted axis left men, women, and developing babies profoundly undone.

“Love consists of a commitment which limits one’s freedom – it is a giving of the self, and to give oneself means just that: to limit one’s freedom on behalf of another. Limitation of one’s freedom might seem to be something negative and unpleasant, but love makes it a positive, joyful and creative thing. Freedom exists for the sake of love.” Karol Wojtyła, Love and Responsibility

[i] https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256390/2023-witnessed-continued-attacks-on-pro-life-pregnancy-centers-churches

[ii] https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/fbi-justice-department-twist-federal-law-arrest-charge-pro-life

[iii] After forty years of Rita and I involved in helping women in this predicament, the guy walking or threatening to walk if the woman becomes pregnant is commonplace. The expectation of the man to “do the right thing” is a quaint and naive anachronism.

1 Comment

Filed under Culture views, Faith and Reason

Perfect Storm

“The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.” Abraham Lincoln, 1862 Address to Congress

Shipwreck_in_Stormy_Seas_by_Joseph_Vernet,_National_Gallery,_London Public DomainIn 1997 Sebastian Junger published his first major book.[i] In “The Perfect Storm” Junger described the final voyage of the Andrea Gail, a six-man crewed commercial fishing vessel out of Gloucester, MA[ii] in 1991. The ‘perfect storm’ was hatched by the combining forces of a classic North Atlantic Nor’easter and Hurricane Grace, a late season brute coming up out of the Caribbean.  “A mature hurricane is by far the most powerful event on Earth,” wrote Junger, “The combined nuclear arsenals of the United States and the former Soviet Union don’t contain enough energy to keep a hurricane going for one day.” There were 60 mile per hour winds, but they generated 75-foot waves that overwhelmed the ship.

Today we face a similar perfect storm, but our victory over it will not be as simple as finding a safe harbor or running from it to an open sea. Our enemy is not wind and waves, but a revolution that has been building for three hundred years and broke full force upon us in the sixties. The classic Nor’easter in this analogy is good old-fashioned concupiscence, hedonism, and the hopeless quest for happiness through means insufficient to sustain it. The hurricane that accelerated the perfect storm into frenzy is the post-modern madness of self-fulfillment and the illusion that we can be anyone or anything we please.

One devastating manifestation of the perfect storm has been called by many, the “Sexual Revolution,” and it was to have freed us from the traditional chains of marriage and responsibility. More accurately I believe, it has been named the “Lonely Revolution’ because of the desolation visited on our culture, our morality, and most damaging on our marriages and families.

“Even in a world that’s being shipwrecked, remain brave and strong.” St. Hildegard of Bingen

The human costs of the Lonely Revolution are well documented (See links in the box below). What we also must attend to is the underlying creed that fuels it. The late Polish sociologist Zygmunt Bauman wrote that naming our times “post-modern” was neither illustrative nor particularly useful. He coined a better term in his book, “Liquid Modernity.”[iii] Too many find themselves adrift in isolated individual survival pods, essentially disconnected, fatherless both in family and metaphorically.  We struggle with “the growing conviction that change is the only permanence, and uncertainty the only certainty.” He wrote further, “Forms of modern life may differ in quite a few respects – but what unites them all is precisely their fragility, temporariness, vulnerability, and inclination to constant change. To ‘be modern’ means to modernize – compulsively, obsessively; not so much just ‘to be’, let alone to keep its identity intact, but forever ‘becoming’, avoiding completion, staying underdefined. Each new structure which replaces the previous one as soon as it is declared old-fashioned and past its use-by date is only another momentary settlement – acknowledged as temporary and ‘until further notice’”[iv].

Thus, we drift untethered, unmoored, alone. No disconnection is more unsettling than the hook up culture of the Lonely Revolution, which separates men and women in an essential way. No longer is the profound union of sex defined by marriage, commitment, love, mutual total gift of self, and respect. It is one-night stands of sweaty sheets and furtive morning after departures. Of obsessive seeking of meaning in pleasure and bogus intimacy, but with no real path to contentment or fulfillment.

Neither war nor pestilence has undermined our civilization more effectively than the dishonest dogma that sex and marriage and children are not connected, and that we must make sure that disconnection is implemented such that the intrinsic male and female human bond stays broken.[v]

“Character is formed in the stormy billows of the world.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe[vi]

This a passage with a quote posted by a friend last week on just one aspect of this dreadful storm.

“So, prolife feminism, in a nutshell, states that for most of history women were treated as property. Obviously, this is patriarchy. And patriarchy, among other things, is the epitome of “might makes right” thinking.

“It says, “Because I am bigger, stronger, and have more power and wealth than you, I can treat you however I choose. I can control you, abuse you, and even use violence against you if I want!”

“Through our liberation as women, we are no longer thought of as property (in most of America at least) but many feminists have adopted that very same patriarchal way thinking, which I guess makes sense as we’ve been seeped in for ages. Anyway, now they are applying this “might makes right” mentality to their very own children in the womb without even realizing it.

“WE are the bigger, stronger, more powerful ones, and rather than using our strength and privilege to protect the vulnerable, we’re merely passing that same patriarchal flavor of dehumanizing oppression down to the unborn by denying their agency, and humanity.

“And here’s the kicker – that old shitty patriarchy still wins anyway! Because by promoting abortion as the ultimate “choice” (even though for so many women it’s anything but a choice, but I digress) our capitalist hellscape of unrelenting production doesn’t have to slow down one bit. It can keep chugging along with all of us happy little cogs in the machine going without things like paid family leave, universal healthcare, accommodations on college campuses for pregnant and parenting students, or ya know, other things like Amazon workers who need to be relocated to a desk job for 9 months… yeah, no, none of that, gross. Progress that says female fertility isn’t a liability? Boooo.

“Abortion on demand keeps the status quo neatly in place and reminds us little ladies that in order to operate outside of the home, we must physically take on the male normative form which is never with child.

“Abortion is simply the flesh tax we must pay – sacrificing the lives of our own children – for entry into YOUR world.

“And then we are told to call that bullshit “equality.””

-Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa

Abortion as liberation or what is peddled as bodily autonomy as a defense of it are perfect propagandizing to enable male carelessness. The woman is not liberated; it is the man who is licensed to engage in the baby making act without obligation or respect or dignity or self-emptying gift to one another or commitment to the profound responsibility of child raising or love.

And then we are told to call that bullshit “equality.”

Headline grabbing corporations which purport to “value” the bodily autonomy and freedom of their female employees now offer pay for abortions and transportation to states that allow abortions. Vanity Fair, MSNBC, and all the usual suspects heap praise on their generosity. Such phony philanthropy panders to the lies into which women have been sentenced by the sexual revolution culture. Pervasive indoctrination reinforces the deadly message that killing their children is freedom for women.

The primary motivation for corporations is blatantly obvious:  to enhance the bottom line. Please, we are not fools. A full-term birth, even without complications risk, parental leave, and an additional insured in the family plan health insurance is ten or twenty-fold times more expensive than an abortion even including transportation, room, and board. Especially so in large corporations that self-insure, but even in smaller companies, health insurance premiums are renegotiated every year based on experience and costs.  And that doesn’t begin to consider lost productivity, retraining replacements, and later time off for childcare. High fives all around in the Human Resource Department: big woke culture points and a big win in the board room.

Let’s not be naive: there is no altruism in paying for a plane ticket to obliterate a life.[vii]

And then we are told to call that bullshit “equality.”

Another recent post from another friend:  The terms “fetus” and “zygote” are no different than “toddler” or “teenager;” they refer to stages of human development. Toddlers possess the same dignity as teenagers just as fetuses and zygotes possess the same dignity as any other human.[viii] Hence, every human life begins in the same way, and absent violence or disease proceeds apace through all his or her stages from conception to natural death.  The science of embryology is clear and consistent.

JPII Quote copyright CatholicVoteProponents dearly love to frame the conversation in superficially clever emotional terms (“Keep your rosaries off our ovaries.” Or “Our bodies, Ourselves.”) or some version of freedom necessary for women to succeed or marginalizing the pro-life position as religious ‘extremism.’ They decline the opportunity to conduct a reasoned moral argument. The syllogism looks like this: A.) It is always morally repugnant, and no justification exists to deliberately attack and destroy innocent human life. B.) A fetus is just another word for small developing human being. Therefore, C.) Deliberate killing of a human fetus is morally repugnant. No religion is required for the propositions or the conclusion. Some prominent atheists are pro-life advocates with arguments based on logic, science, and the existence of objective truth that is knowable.[ix]

I look forward to the defenses which will surely come. Challenge the propositions or the logic as you may. Will they be coming as science deniers – not really a human being? Or will they be submitting a moral proposal that the large and powerful have a ‘right’ to take the life of the small and defenseless when their developing lives are judged sufficiently inconvenient? I will fight that battle until I can no longer stand.

The fairy tale with a happy ending is that an ‘unplanned’ and problematic child is a malignancy, a robbery, a weakening of equality, and that this burgeoning, undefined life ought to be expendable. But grotesquely underlying this narrative like an ogre under the bridge is a terrible truth.

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” Neil Gaiman, Coraline

Illustration 1: “Shipwreck in Stormy Seas,” by Joseph Vernet, National Gallery, London, Public Domain

Illustration 2: From CatholicVote

[i] http://www.sebastianjunger.com/the-perfect-storm He has sincIe published many great books I have read, which you can find at the link as well. His mother hired Albert DeSalvo to do some handyman work in her house in Belmont when Junger was a child, a narrative of which Mr. Junger included in his book “A Death in Belmont” about DeSalvo, the ‘Boston Strangler.’ More recently he produced a marvelous documentary based on his book, “War,” and his time as an embedded journalist with a platoon during their 15-month deployment in the Korengal Valley of Afghanistan.  Much good reading here if you haven’t enjoyed the skill and imagery of Mr. Junger’s work.

[ii] An acclaimed movie followed, which helped bring Mark Wahlberg to star status as the captain of the Andrea Gail.

[iii] Many thanks to Genevieve Kineke who introduced me to Bauman and “Liquid Modernity” in her superb talk on the irreplaceable role of motherhood in all its wonderful manifestations in the family and spiritually. If you can find her speaking and especially if she is giving her presentation on “How Elastic is Motherhood,” get to it.

[iv] From “Liquid Modernity,” Zygmunt Bauman, 2000, Polity Press, in association with Blackwell Publishers, LTD, Cambridge, UK

[v] See links below in a separate box in essays and charts that speak eloquently about these effects and illusions.

[vi] In Goethe’s 1790 play Torquato Tasso the character Leonora speaks (act 1, scene 2) the lines “Es bildet ein Talent sich in der Stille / Sich ein Charakter in dem Strom der Welt”  From Stack Exchange: https://literature.stackexchange.com/

[vii] Why Big Business Loves Abortion

[viii] Every embryological text states something similar to this from Princeton.edu: Life Begins at Fertilization with the Embryo’s Conception. “Development of the embryo begins at Stage 1 when a sperm fertilizes an oocyte and together they form a zygote.” “Human development begins after the union of male and female gametes or germ cells during a process known as fertilization (conception).”

[ix] Secular humanist/atheist video for life.

Links to accompany ‘Perfect Storm’ post

The Zealous Faith of Secularism (How the Sexual Revolution became a dogma), First Things, Dr. Mary Eberstadt

Five Paradoxes of the Sexual Revolution Part I   The Catholic Thing, Dr. Mary Eberstadt

Five Paradoxes of the Sexual Revolution Part II   The Catholic Thing, Dr. Mary Eberstadt

The Growing Feminist Rejection of the Sexual Revolution, Crisis Magazine, Austin Ruse

Dr. Anthony Esolen Podcast about his book “Sex and the Unreal City” and why the Sexual Revolution has produced so many lonely people.  Presented at Magdalen College  The Loneliness Revolution

Millennials and the Loneliness Epidemic  Forbes

Inside the Adolescent Mental Health Crisis NY Times

The American Family Today Pew Research

The Loneliness Pandemic Harvard Magazine

Bitter Pill – Economics, First Things, Timothy Reichert

The Long-Term Struggle for Hearts and Minds, The Catholic Thing, David Carlin

Great collection of Public Discourse essays about a post Dobbs decision America and common myths about abortion.

Some samples:

Marco Rubio is Right: The Life of a New Human Being Begins at Conception, BY PATRICK LEE, CHRISTOPHER O. TOLLEFSEN AND ROBERT P. GEORGE

Forty Years Later: It’s Time for a New Feminism, BY ELISE ITALIANO

The Lazy Slander of the Pro-Life Cause (Answers the slander that pro-life advocates only care for the baby before it is born), BY HELEN ALVARÉ, GREG PFUNDSTEIN, MATTHEW SCHMITZ, AND RYAN T. ANDERSON

Why the Arguments about “Bodily Autonomy” and “Forced Birth” Fail to Justify Abortion, BY RYAN T. ANDERSON AND ALEXANDRA DESANCTIS

Many more thoughtful and well written essays on various related topics regarding common myths and what a post Roe country will look like.

Index of all essays on the topic from Public Discourse

2 Comments

Filed under Background Perspective, Culture views

Weltschmerz

“In the groves of their academy, at the end of every vista, you see nothing but the gallows.” Reflections on the Revolution in France, Edmund Burke, 1790

In the seventeenth century the French author Francois de La Rochefoucauld famously wrote that hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue. I wonder if the hypocrites who prompted the quote cared whether they were caught out. Recent events in the Rhode Island legislature indicate that the current batch of hypocrites want only to avoid a memorable line that will make the Providence Journal or WPRI in the five o’clock news and show up in their opponent’s talking points in the next election. Little heed seems to be paid to how conspicuous is their cynical hypocrisy to listeners, only matters if it will cost them votes. Hypocrisy is expected, even celebrated, if it’s sufficiently clever and the goals align with the progressive vision.

A Providence legislator, Dan McKearnan, speaking on the floor of the House said that his “deep faith” (Catholic} informed his advocacy and that he trusted women to “make holy choices.” Holy choices. The choices they would make when the legislation passed would be to kill or not to kill their offspring, to “terminate” their pregnancy, which the legislation (H5125a,) sanctioned up to the moment of birth. Forty weeks. Full term, a full four months past viability. A fetus one second, someone’s baby the next. Or someone’s tiny corpse.

In a television news debate on the bill that has passed the House and is waiting Senate action, Rabbi Sarah Mack stated that the bill was a victory for freedom and rightly favored “existing life.” Existing life. Must have cut those boring embryology courses in school. Every major embryology text marks conception as the beginning of human life.  So, science was not her strength, but did she sleep in when they covered Jeremiah 1:5? “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you; before you were born, I set you apart.” Perhaps Rabbi Mack stayed too late at lunch playing bridge in the dining commons when her professor taught Isaiah 49:1. “The Lord called me from the womb, from the body of my mother He named my name.” Or returned late from Fort Lauderdale on spring break when they reviewed the exegesis on Psalm 139:13. “For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.” She said, and rightly so, that it was not right that religion should dictate legislation. However, when legislation first ignores science and then fails to make a moral judgment informed by a conscience formed by faith or justice or reason or protection of the most vulnerable, well, that’s a sadder tale.

“We have obligations to mankind at large, which are not in consequence of any voluntary pact. They arise from the relation of man to man, and the relation of man to God, which are not matters of choice.” Edmund Burke

The bill was named the Reproductive Privacy Act, which is a further irony in that it is concerned with not with “reproduction,” but with its lethal inhibition. The “privacy” allusion is a tip of the hat to Roe v. Wade, which cited privacy as the foundation for usurping every state’s authority and instantly negated all legislation controlling abortion. The slippery ground for a privacy foundation was created by citing the Griswold v. Connecticut contraception case. One of the most infamous passages in Supreme Court history proposed this nonsense: “The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.  Various guarantees create zones of privacy.” So, the Supreme Court decision that has spelled doom for sixty million pre-born Americans is sustained by a gauzy contrivance of emanations, penumbras and zones of privacy, suspended on a spider’s web.

A second spider’s web, upon which hangs the first, is the blind certainty that supports the progressive enterprise: the myth of human perfectionism – that progress is linear and will always move us closer towards some ideal future where human frailty and tendency towards prejudice, violence, using others for personal gain or pleasure will diminish to nothing as enlightened (and coercive) governance leads us to the promised land. Just the history in our own times, especially in the century immediately preceding this one, when various Utopian ideologies delivered the bloodiest hundred years in human history. The twentieth century alone provides the evidence that such beliefs are at best naïve, and at worst deliberate utilitarian delusions in pursuit of a totalitarian agenda.

The natural heir to that bloody century is our own. War, oppression, human trafficking are obvious and persistent horrors. Far worse is the dehumanization of a whole class of human beings, and it has wrought the highest tally, the single highest cause of death in the world and in our country last year that overwhelms the toll of any other. Disease, war, murder, terrorism, cancer, starvation, unclean waters are eclipsed in their body counts. Simply pronounce that yet-to-be-born humans are not human, and we contrive a cardboard culture that promises human fulfillment based on the lie of autonomy. We will secure economic futures built on killing our own children, feed our worst self-absorbed selves, and let it metastasize[i]. The largest single cause of death in the world in 2018 was abortion – 42 million, with over a million of those tiny victims in our own country.  Eleven million and counting rapidly year to date this year.[ii] We masquerade it as medical care, yet once exposed to the light sickens all who see it.[iii] Set up the kill and call it freedom, call it liberation, even call it virtue. “Weep not for me, (mothers of Jerusalem), weep for yourselves and for your children.”

“The Future is, of all things, the thing least like eternity. It is the most completely temporal part of time—for the Past is frozen and no longer flows, and the Present is all lit up with its eternal rays. Hence the encouragement we have given to all those schemes of thought such as Creative Evolution, Scientific Humanism, or Communism, which fix men’s attention on the Future, on the very core of temporality. Hence nearly all vices are rooted in the Future. Gratitude looks to the Past and love to the Present; fear, avarice, lust, and ambition look ahead.” C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters, (New York: Macmillan Co.,1943), p.xv

[i] For a good article on the metastasis, see in this week’s Public Discourse, the article by Anthony Esolen: When Reason Does Not Suffice: Why Our Culture Still Accepts Abortion https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/04/50665/

[ii] From the Worldometers site.

[iii] From the true story of Abby Johnson, former employee of the year and director of a Texas Planned Parenthood facility. In “Unplanned” she tells her story. Here is the pivotal scene that changed her life. Watch it reflect. https://youtu.be/Z9bMwP2CLP8

 

6 Comments

Filed under Faith and Reason, Politics and government

Transitions

Guest blog post – Rita Parquette

In the mid-seventies, I worked as an obstetrical nurse in the labor and delivery rooms of Augusta General Hospital in Maine. Post Roe v Wade, the transition was well underway from abortion as a rare medical necessity to save the life of the mother to common. We witnessed the practice grow from rare to wildfire – sixty million in the U.S. since those early days. The near religious fervor of the pro-abortion lobby seeking ever fewer constraints placed on killing their offspring, at first was a small minority, but well financed. They rode a wave of ironically named ‘liberation’ and ran over all compunctions and objections. Roe was the most liberal decision regarding abortion in the world at that time.  It allowed abortion through all nine months of pregnancy.

During that time, nurses were sometimes demeaned by a few doctors, but they held firm as they were able. One firm stand for many of us was abortion. We observed with justified concern the decreasing empathy and hardening treatment of both mothers and babies from those doctors who shared one characteristic in their practices: they added abortion provider to their resumes. The doctors plying the termination trade were having difficulty finding OR nurses to attend them in the Augusta General operating room in the basement; at one point the head nurse on the upper OB floor asked us to “help out our doctors.” We refused. Our job was healing and preserving, not deliberately taking life. This was not a religious decision, but a humanitarian one and conformed to the Hippocratic Oath: First, do no harm.

“Those eyes that had hardly opened to the light of the earthly sun forever and ever were closed to the light of the earthly sun…” From “God Speaks,” “Holy Innocents” Charles Peguy

One anecdote remains always vivid in my memory and haunts me to this day, nearly forty-five years later. On a typical busy evening, I was helping two young mothers in labor. We had moved on from the scopolamine doping of women to more humane and dignified obstetrical practices. My practice was to try and calm their fear, then guide them through controlled breathing and relaxation techniques.  One of my patients was only about sixteen weeks pregnant, and we had no neo-natal intensive care facilities in Augusta. Optimally we would attempt to arrest her sporadic and weak contractions. Standard practice was to start an IV. Hydration and improved electrolyte balance at times could stop premature labor, and the pregnancy could proceed to term. Not that night.

Dr. R, one of the more zealous of the pro-abortion OB/GYN practitioners, entered the labor room and spoke briefly to the young mother; I was busy with another patient and not privy to the conversation. He then strode over and instructed me curtly to put an ampule of Pitocin into the IV.  Pitocin is a synthetic version of oxytocin, which is a natural powerful hormone that induces more rapid and stronger contractions to intensify labor.  We were trying to retard labor or stop it to give the baby her best chance, so I was surprised, then aghast. I refused and told him that if he wanted Pitocin into that IV, he would have to do it himself! We used metal folding clipboards for medical charts. While I was busy standing at the nurse’s high station writing my own notes, he flung this patient’s metal chart about five feet, hard, and hit me on my left side in the ribs. I never saw it coming. Then he added the Pitocin into the IV. The labor intensified.  I was there for the mother and her baby.  I monitored the babies heart beat with a fetal stethoscope and told the mother I was getting a good heart beat and added that information to my notes.

Inevitably she was ready for delivery and wheeled into the delivery room. At this point, Dr. R’s friend, an anesthesiologist entered the scene.  We had many wonderful doctors at our hospital, but Dr. R and this particular anesthesiologist were not among them.   This anesthesiologist’s favorite way to summon a nurse was to whistle with two fingers in his mouth.  He put my patient deeply under, something rarely done because of risk to the newborn infant. The Pitocin accelerated labor, delivery ran its predictable course, and the unconscious mother delivered her tiny baby girl.  Dr. R dropped the baby into a stainless-steel basin nearby normally used to receive the placenta. He finished up quickly and left the delivery room before the mother awoke.

Immediately, a nursery nurse, whom I had already warned about the coming of this small baby, rescued the baby from her cold metal refuse bucket, wrapped and carried her to the newborn warming station where she suctioned her in a futile attempt to clear her breathing passages and stimulate breathing. She then rubbed and did her best to comfort this tiny girl. After over ten minutes without a breath, her heart ceased its beat.  The scene felt surreal to me; I was out of sync with the events and with the doctors – like a dream, a disturbing dream. I did not know what else I could do. Something like this had never happened to me or the other nurse.

Epilogue reflections:

When the mother woke from the anesthesia, I told her that her baby was born with a heartbeat but was unable to breath. Still somewhat drowsy, I tried to comfort her, but she seemed hard to reach.  I think she too might have felt like she was in a surreal world and not sure how she got there.  After her discharge, the mother called a mortician and a funeral was held.  The funeral home director received the doctor’s notes, my nurse’s notes and the notes of the nursery nurse who had done her best for the baby. Both doctors described the little girl as macerated, born dead, indeed they agreed she had been dead for a while. Both sets of nurse’s notes described her true condition. Since medical notes can wind up as legal documents, the funeral director notified the hospital administrator of the discrepancy and conflicting narratives. When the nursing supervisor for our shift came to me for an explanation, I assured her the nurse’s notes were the accurate ones and explained exactly what happened. She gave me a knowing look, and I never heard another word.

A couple of years later, when we had returned to the faith of our youth, I confessed this incident to our pastor, who remains a dear friend to this day. He suggested lovingly that in the circumstances I tried my best and that I needed to forgive myself. Father Joe further suggested that I should name the baby and pray for her mom and for all that had happened around that difficult night.  I named her Gabriella and do pray about this still. I hope to see her again some fine day and have a conversation.

A final related episode comes to mind. The equally troubled nursery room nurse had a discussion with an experienced and humane pediatrician the next day. She explained to him what had happened and asked if we had done the right thing in trying to save her and delivering all the professional care we could muster for that little girl. He smiled sadly and looked into her eyes. He assured her, “Where there is life, there is always hope.”

 “I AM says God, Master of the Three Virtues.  Faith is a faithful wife. Charity is an ardent mother. But Hope is a tiny girl.” “God Speaks, “Hope” Charles Peguy

5 Comments

Filed under Personal and family life