Tag Archives: news

Coming Home

“In a liberal society that values the moral and legal equality of all persons, the undocumented are impossible subjects, persons whose presence is a social reality yet a legal impossibility.”  Mae N Ngai, “Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America” 2003

The Wave at Coyote Butte

On our recent annual Maine pilgrimage our great good fortune was to visit with our former pastor, Father Joe McKenna, now retired in Portland. Our conversations are always wide and deep about various topics ranging secular and religious. Never a disappointment to be with him.

A good storyteller, he told the tale of his Irish forebears who immigrated first from County Monaghan in Ireland to Prince Edward Island, then answered the call for jobs in the mills of Rumford, Maine. Thousands of immigrants, mostly French Canadian and Irish came in a similar way to build railroads, build textile and paper mills then run the machines in them all over New England. 

From Prince Edward Island, they often traveled via the PEI Railway to the Borden–Cape Tormentine ferry, then Canadian lines to Quebec/Maine connections. The Grand Trunk Railway/CN line into Lewiston was a gateway for the workers—locals even called the Lincoln St. depot a mini “Ellis Island.” Trains from Quebec (and Maritimes connections) dropped people steps from “Little Canada” in Lewiston. An hour or so north, they would arrive in Rumford, and the McKenna family’s new home.  Father Joe worked as a pipe fitter in the paper mill for a while before college and the seminary.

Before 1924 nothing was required to go to work in Maine mills from Canadian citizens except willingness, diligence, hard work, and a train ticket. Pack a bag or two, buy a train ticket, go to work. They came for an opportunity to work hard and flourish, for themselves and most especially for their families. No different than most that have come here for the last four centuries. Moving into company housing at first, then many would build homes, and a new life. Establish parishes, build churches with their own hands, create social clubs, dance on Saturday nights, volunteer in their communities, help their kids with their homework, have block parties.  Their kids and grandkids were birthright citizens, many of them fought and died for America in combat, worked in the mills, and many would pursue other vocations becoming the first in their families to graduate from college. Irish lawyers, doctors, college professors, legislators, and an occasional president.

The mills and the mill owners needed workers to produce the lumber, textiles, paper, and other products that American consumers wanted. The workers needed opportunity and a solid foundation on which to build a life for their families. Such a simple transactional confluence of interests built the most prosperous country in the world, perhaps in the history of the world.

“Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” Inscribed on the bottom of the Statue of Liberty, from the poem “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus

Before 1924, U.S.–Canada land borders were comparatively loose; seasonal and circular migration for mill work was common. Most came with no identity requirements or identity checks. Many would go back and forth as the work allowed with no visa requirements. The U.S. Border Patrol was only created in 1924, and many Canadians living in the U.S. before then later “re-immigrated” formally in the 1940s to regularize status. The process for that normal and relatively painless process was established in the Registry Act of 1929.  People who entered before June 3, 1921, had a clean record, were “of good moral character,” and were not deportable, could create an official arrival record using a simple form (659 “Record of Registry”) without leaving the U.S.  Many Canadians in mill towns did this in the early 1930’s. Many wanted to be full citizens who could vote and participate in local government.  Straightforward, relatively simple, and considerate of their humanity, the registration process was common sense. America was happy to welcome the productive workers she needed to grow.

A blog post is a poor instrument to track the whole history of border law and enforcement since then.[i] Complex, inconsistent, confusing, chaotic, political, rife with conflicting ideology and rancor on all sides. This is not a suggestion that the recent history of unenforced law and virtual open borders was effective or salutary.  A nation to be a nation must have borders and rules for crossing them – who qualifies and who doesn’t. Recent efforts by the current administration to secure what was insecure were necessary and long overdue, and the resulting human drama from the long absence of such a border is heartbreaking.

But there is even more heartbreak with what has ensued since the border was shut down hard.

“(A)n irrational fear, hatred, and hostility toward immigrants has been a defining feature of our nation from the colonial era to the Trump era.” Erika Lee, America for Americans: A History of Xenophobia in the United States (New York: Basic Books, 2019)

Most of us have an aversion to statistical arguments, but in this debate, they are inescapable. Compounding the difficulty is finding solid sources for the numbers; after all, “undocumented” means undocumented. What is presented here are reasonable approximations from the best sources I could find.  Here’s a few that are verifiable from usually reliable authority but with the caveat stated above. Vulnerable populations are not lining up for the census takers. or surveyors. But in the critical agricultural labor sector with a perennial shortage, about 40% of workers are undocumented and 79% of them have been here longer than ten years, 2/3 of them longer than 15 years. Across all labor sectors, most of which have an increasing shortage of experienced labor, such as construction, landscaping, and hotel service, there are significant numbers of undocumented workers. Over 66% of all undocumented workers have been here over ten years.

I worked in and around the construction industry for over forty five years and can tell many tales of these workers. Some are funny, some poignant, some personal. Some of the finest people I have ever worked with or met probably come up short with documents[ii]. What I can say from deep experience is absent the contributions of these workers, much less would be getting built in America and at a much slower pace. Much more could be written, but I only want to present a general outline for a broader view.

One more set of stats is needed for additional perspective. The major justification for the mass incarcerations and deportations has been the much publicized stories of horrific crimes committed by what the administration refers to as “illegal immigrants.” The common inference is that the preponderance of the undocumented are a danger to the rest of us. Gang members, terrorists, murderers, rapists, child traffickers, carjackers, awful people. No one would ever object to rounding those miscreants up and dropping them down a deep hole. But is that the norm for these people without papers? Actual numbers from the most comprehensive studies to date that have been done in Texas show that just under 80% have no criminal records and many of those crimes are traffic offenses, DUI’s, and misdemeanors. The real numbers of felony conviction rates from the Texas study funded by the Federal Department of Justice show that native born citizens have a felony conviction rate of 1,422 per 100,000. The comparable tally for undocumented immigrants was 782 per 100,000, which is about 55% of the native born rate.[iii]

ICE agent Photograph by Olga Fedorova_AP

Masked ICE (Immigration Control Enforcement) agents are busily scooping them up. Some are much publicized criminals and gang members. However, the big numbers come from raiding meat processing plants, farms, landscape and groundskeeping crews, then going after construction jobsites and day laborers at big warehouses and Home Depots. New ICE agents are being recruited as young as 18 years old with a $50,000 signing bonus to quickly ramp up the number of agents. There are leaked internal memos citing a 3,000 per week target or quota; a number that has since been denied by those that wrote the   memos. In the early days of the roundup the documentation for those who had been arrested showed that 50% had criminal records; by June, that had dropped to 30%. As conservative influencer and podcaster Joe Rogan protested, we expected them to take murderers off the street, but we are now arresting landscapers, construction and Home Depot workers. Reports are that 60,000, many formerly employed and paying taxes, now languish in makeshift barbed wire camps in substandard conditions called celebratory names like “Alligator Alcatraz.”[iv] What could go wrong?

“The search for a scapegoat is the easiest of all hunting expeditions.” Rene Girard “It is not an accident that the victims are always chosen from among those who are in some way different, vulnerable, or powerless, and therefore not easily able to defend themselves.” – from interviews with Gerard by Alain de Botton[v]

There is still a darker side to this: a long sad history of scapegoating in our immigration policy and politics. What is happening today is just one more dismal chapter of how to get elected by placing blame for our unhappiness and dysfunction on a convenient tackling dummy. When any human beings are downgraded to being moving pieces on a political battlefield, bad things happen. When a large group of human beings are feared, blamed, vilified, dehumanized, and degraded based solely on their immigration status, not on the individual’s record or “moral character,” we have lost our way.

Whether it was the common signs, “No Irish Need Apply,” of the mid nineteenth century or the derogative “WOPS”[vi] reference for Italian immigrants in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, when new large groups of a particular ethnicity immigrate to America, the fear and loathing of the unknown soon emerges among us and is leveraged by politicians with their wet finger in the air looking for votes.

I do not advocate open borders, secure borders should be a given, but a cautionary note about how we handle millions of the people who live here now and have for a decade or longer. Do we need to round out secure borders with a system analogous to the 1940’s registry as more humane, more just, more common sense than the big roundup? Not to be described both inaccurately and mockingly as “amnesty,’ but a better way to treat those that share our neighborhoods, join us in worship, pay taxes, create families and do what immigrants have always done here: make America great[vii].

“You can go to live in France, but you cannot become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot become a German, a Turk, or a Japanese. But anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to live in America and become an American.”  Ronald Reagan’s last speech as President. (TranscriptVideo excerpt.)

[i] Don’t’ take my word for it. Do your own short research on comparing the various 1929-1940 registration acts and the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) for a sense of how complex and misunderstood now out of date these laws are, and none of which remotely solves the current morass. Google or ChatGPT or your favorite bot will do. It’s not hard to find.

[ii] Here’s one such personal encounter from a blog post at least a dozen years old. Selvin.

[iii] U.S. Department of Justice–supported report, “Unauthorized Immigration, Crime, and Recidivism: Evidence From Texas (2012–2018)”, provides arrest rate data across several felony categories:

Violent crime arrests (2012–2018):

U.S.-born citizens: 213 per 100,000

Undocumented immigrants: 96.2 per 100,000

Drug crime arrests:

U.S.-born: 337.2 per 100,000

Undocumented: 135 per 100,000

Property crime arrests:

U.S.-born: 165.2 per 100,000

Undocumented: 38.5 per 100,000

Homicide arrests:

U.S.-born: 4.8 per 100,000

Undocumented: 1.9 per 100,000

[iv] Judge orders much of “Alligator Alcatraz” dismantled.

[v] https://scapegoatshadows.com/alain-de-botton-rene-girard/

[vi] The common understanding is the derivation of the insulting WOPS characterization as With Out Papers is false. It came from an overheard and misunderstood enthusiastic greeting of Italians to one another.

 John Ciardi, Browser’s Dictionary:

”WOPS is a “Pejorative name for an Italian. . . . From the Italian, south-of-Rome dialect, guappo, dude. Introduced into America c. 1900, [H. L.] Mencken cited guappo as a common form of greeting among Italian immigrants. It was never that but a rather jovial exclamation when a man showed up in his flashiest Sunday best: che guappo! What a dude! . . . (The commonly offered derivation W(ith) O(ut) P(apers), with reference to immigrants at Ellis Island is nonsense.)”

7 Comments

Filed under Background Perspective, Politics and government

perspective

Someone left the cake out in the rain

I don’t think that I can take it

‘Cause it took so long to bake it

And I’ll never have that recipe again

Oh, no…. Jimmy Webb, “MacArthur Park”

[i]We have survived the election of 2024 (so far). Some are fleeing the country and heading to more stable Perspectivesociety – like France or Somalia. Some are pledging to shun and have no contact with family, friends and neighbors who voted for the winner (which does not bode well for some marriages, block parties, and Thanksgiving dinners). Some are joining the “4B” movement[ii] of women who are shaving their heads and pledging no men, no dating, no sex, no marriage, and no children.

This seems counterproductive to long-term societal health in a nation nearly 25% below the replacement rate necessary to sustain the population and programs like Social Security and Medicare. Not to mention sustaining a trend to run out of consumers in a country that is centered on consumerism. Creating together in solidarity a joyful future full of hope. Makes sense to me.

And so it goes.

“In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed and the next place, oblige it to control itself.” James Madison, Federalist Papers

The campaigns of both parties, never a bloodless affair, were dispiritedly acrimonious. Opponents were not merely variously fascist, racist, murderous, communist, or tyrannical; they were evil instruments of the devil, irredeemable and odious. We all lived through the recent campaigns in which the Harris campaign raised and spent over a billion dollars in direct funds and around six hundred and fifty in outside PAC spending. The Trump campaign raised about three hundred and eighty million in direct campaign funds and another seven hundred and eleven million in outside PAC spending.[iii] That’s an astonishing jackpot and a lot of ads we sat through. And been polled about. And identifying which voters were likely to support the candidates, then trying to turn them out. Vitriol ruled. Accusations flew. Lies abounded. I was very happy to see the backside of that.

We hate politicians. We want principled leaders who are courageous, articulate, calm, and not noisy faultfinders. We want statesmen, but they are scarce. What we have are opportunistic candidates who tell us what we think we want to hear depending upon the audience that day. Not a recent phenomenon, but seemingly endemic in our system of governance; this sorry state is – in the end – the nature of representative democracy.

“With exceptions so rare that they are regarded as miracles and freaks of nature, successful democratic politicians are insecure and intimidated men. They advance politically only as they placate, appease, bribe, seduce, bamboozle, or otherwise manage to manipulate the demanding and threatening elements in their constituencies. The decisive consideration is not whether the proposition is good but whether it is popular—not whether it will work well and prove itself but whether the active talking constituents like it immediately.” Walter Lippmann, “The Decline of Western Democracy”, Atlantic Magazine, February 1955.

election map

An alternative to despair (or elation) after the election might be to take a deep breath, look at the results and learn, maybe change course. With a cursory look, the Red Wave seems to have been decisive, a trifecta, Executive Office, Senate, and House. There is some evidence to support triumphalist gloating. In the electoral college, President Trump captured 312 out of a possible 538 and Kamala Harris a distant 226, a remarkable gain of 80 delegates since his loss in 2020 and a percentage gain of nearly fifteen percent. Tsunami scale.

However, once we look at the detail, it gets a little murky. The margin of total voters was slim, under two percent, and after the multiple third party candidates are factored in, he didn’t have a true majority over fifty percent. The Red Wave means something, but it is more a pronounced ripple. Except for four states, the left – right split is not hard to decipher. Two percent of voters make the difference; of course, there was a whole lot more than that in geography.[iv] Mostly the coastal elites v the ‘basket of deplorables’ in flyover country.

There is something else going on, and an election of a disruptive and off-putting real estate developer and game show host is not going to solve all our problems and cure all our ills.

Two thirds of the voters in the country think we are headed in the wrong direction. Our leaders seem not to recognize the struggles of those who don’t go to wine tastings in enclaves like Georgetown. Despite all reassurances of a recovered economy, most of us are aware that accumulated twenty one percent inflation since 2020 is painful. We get nervous every time we go to the grocery store. Paying the credit card bills and keeping nutritious food on the table for our kids and taking them to the doctor when they need it seems to be ever more at risk.

I won’t reiterate what people better informed and smarter than I have covered with well-reasoned insight.[v] See the footnotes below for links to some good sources with which you may not be familiar.

“What people want to be governed by a ruling class that holds it in contempt? What historical precedent is there for a lasting culture whose story-makers are embarrassed by their own ancestors? How can any culture continue into the future if it is teaching its children a deeply disturbing form of racialised self-loathing?” Paul Kingsnorth, “The Abbey of Misrule” Substack, “The Faustian Fire,” April 28, 2021

The seemingly irreconcilable divisions of polity and principles have not abated. If anything, the passions of the election have widened the chasm. For politicians, the political process, the legacy media that once served as a de facto fourth branch of government to keep legislators honest and voters informed, and in the immense Federal bureaucracy scornfully referred to as the ‘deep state,’ trust is at an all time low point. Approval ratings of the current administration were in the thirties. So, an unlikable and unlikely challenger who himself has approval ratings just better than small plastic bags full of dog excrement left on the side of a hiking trail made an historic comeback. His disapproval ratings approach ‘fear and loathing’ among his many detractors. The election has been resolved; the divide that separates us has deepened.

Seventy five plus million voters chose a problematic candidate, a blustering disruptor with baggage. Why would they do so? The obvious answer is in the previous citation that just under seventy percent of us think the country is headed in the wrong direction. We want a disruptor who promises to shake the foundations and to fix us. We’re unhappy with a paycheck to paycheck wallet and not sure we can pay for groceries if we make our car payments. We’re unhappy with a national debt that exceeds our mortgage per household[vi]. We’re unhappy with our credit card balances growing so rapidly to keep ourselves temporality afloat – currently all together at $1.17 trillion, a daunting high water mark. We’re unhappy with Federal agencies holding enormous power seemingly targeting political enemies. We’re unhappy with incessant, ideological ‘wokeism’ incoherence, which is increasingly detached from what most see as reality. We’re unhappy reading about and experiencing that agenda being forced upon the institutions of our society: our schools, our government, and even private businesses. Out of our control to deter – so much seems out of our control and beyond our power to affect. Desperate measures – we elect as savior a serial liar and (possibly) reformed exploitive womanizer who calls people ugly names. What the hell is wrong with us?

We’re unhappy with the government we’re living under, and the politicians hold their own subjects outside the Beltway in transparent contempt. That we would willingly choose such a flawed and self-absorbed candidate, one so laden with hubris and flamboyant braggadocio, insulated by surrounding himself with sycophants,  cries out that we are in trouble and see no easy path out.

But choose these people we do. We don’t trust them, and they don’t trust us.

We ask our representatives to accomplish the impossible with effortless grace while looking telegenic, then we disdain them and call them evil. Who would apply for such a job?

“The third and most significant source of pressures which discourage political courage in the conscientious Senator or Congressman… is the pressure of his constituency, the interest groups, the organized letter writers, the economic blocs and even the average voter. To cope with such pressures, to defy them or even to satisfy them is a formidable task. All of us occasionally have the urge to follow the example of Congressman John Steven McGroarty of California, who wrote a constituent in 1934: One of the countless drawbacks of being in Congress is that I am compelled to receive impertinent letters from a jackass like you in which you say I promised to have the Sierra Madre mountains reforested and I have been in Congress two months and haven’t done it. Will you please take two running jumps and go to hell.” From “Profiles in Courage” by John F Kennedy, 1955, Harper

No, something else far deeper is going on, trust is broken, the culture is broken, and one election is not going to fix it. Maybe no election can fix it. More to follow next time. The often quoted lines from Yeats’ “The Second Coming”[vii] seem more instantiated every passing year:

“Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The best lack all conviction, while the worst

Are full of passionate intensity.”

[i] Open source image. The big rock and the photo are not retouched or Photoshopped. Turn upside down if you want a different perspective.

[ii] 4B Movement of fear, misandry, and suicidal bitterness.

[iii] Tracking political spending and sources of funds: https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race

[iv] Election map – Associated Press

[v] From the Tangle news website: https://www.readtangle.com/final-2024-election-post-mortem/ or here from James Heaney at De Civitate: https://decivitate.substack.com/p/some-impromptu-post-election-thoughts

[vi] The average mortgage balance per household is around $146,000. The Federal debt exceeds $35 trillion and growing rapidly. Expressed as a per household debt, each household is on the hook for over $266,000. No business or home could support such a load.

[vii] Poetry Foundation. W.B. Yeats. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43290/the-second-coming

7 Comments

Filed under Politics and government