“Ray Kurzweil is the best person I know at predicting the future of artificial intelligence. His intriguing new book envisions a future in which information technologies have advanced so far and fast that they enable humanity to transcend its biological limitations – transforming our lives in ways we can’t imagine yet.” Bill Gates

Every week it seems business and culture news emerges about the “internet of things.” Our daily lives produce data, and these metadata are tracked, compiled and used to predict, make more comfortable, market to us and filter what we see, hear and experience on the web. Not just tailoring our internet searches to what the search engine “thinks” we want to know, but analyzing key words in our emails and where we linger on the web to “ascertain” through artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms what interests us. Then putting us in touch with our patterns, selling us stuff and fashioning the right box into which we fit – a Procrustean bed. Software is being generated to enhance the sluggish “key words” analysis and advance to concepts and thoughts, something in which computers have not yet surpassed us in ability. They have long since passed us in sheer computing power, speed and memory. Next generation AI software brings intuition and those types of “thinking without thinking” formerly uniquely human judgments written about in Malcolm Gladwell’s “Blink.” Computers are learning to learn and replicate on their own. We are evermore typecast and channeled, aided and abetted into what is profitable financially or politically for someone.

Our smart phones, tablets, computers are joined by our medical records, cars, alarm systems, baby monitors, refrigerators, dish washers, furniture and soon our carpets, toothbrushes, and for all we know toilet seats will feed the maw of data about us. The cloud will know all.

Our rugs will inform us (and the cloud) how often we walk across them, whether we have fallen down and can’t get up, if an unknown walker treads softly upon them or perhaps if we get romantic in front of our fireplace and how long we persist at it. We will go from our smart home to our driverless car, and it will take us door to door.

If we thought the NSA was intrusive, we are desperately naïve. And this is just getting started.

“I would say humans are not purely biological. We’ve already expanded humanity with our technology, and the technology is part of humanity; we are the technology.” Ray Kurzweil

Dr. Kurzweil reflects the hopes of many of those whose belief system is exclusively “scientism,” which holds that science, the scientific method and mathematical reasoning is the only true arbiter of truth and in which we will find humankind’s salvation. The irony of this worldview is while such true scientism believers deride metaphysics, the concepts upon which all of science rests are metaphysical in nature. [i] Scientism is an alternate religion.

He envisions nanobots in our brain, hooked up directly into the cloud. No more fingers on keyboards and mouse to search the internet for knowledge. Our thoughts and memories will access the cloud immediately; we will be one with the cloud, and the cloud will be one with us. He coined the term “Singularity” for this, and his eponymous book ten years ago predicted this state of oneness with computers is not three, two or even one hundred years ahead in science fiction. 2045 is his date for “achieving” singularity. [ii]

Our children and grandchildren will see this, according to the futurist, perhaps even ourselves if we stay healthy and achieve the second aspect of his prediction. All human body parts will be repairable or replaceable with genetic manipulation and perfectly cloned parts from our own DNA, so our brains will become part of the cloud, and our bodies will take on immortality. Millions of car recalls, the roll out of the Affordable Care Act, just my recent experience in figuring out how our new dishwasher worked come to mind. Singularity? What could go wrong?

“And what would they be scared of? There’s nothing to fear in a perfect world, is there?” Catherine Fisher (Welsh author and poet)

Much dystopian science fiction has described computers and robots gradually assuming more and more of our daily lives, then assuming everything. From 2001’s nemesis computer HAL killing the astronauts to Isaac Asimov’s super central computer controlling all in “I Robot” it gets worse. The three rules proscribing that a robot may not harm and must protect any human being broke down. In the Terminator movies, Skybot makes the decision that human kind is a virus on the planet and unleashes genocidal warfare upon us.

I have no mouth and I must screamPerhaps the most awful end for us “hairless apes” is found in Harlan Ellison’s short story from the sixties, “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream.” The world’s computers hook up into one all encompassing web, wipe out all humans, but keep four around to torture. “AM” reads their thoughts and intention, controls not only their environment, but their biology – AM can keep them alive for its amusement with freshly minted organs virtually forever. After the protagonist, Ted, carefully avoids actively thinking of his “solution,” in a lightning strike frees his companions by killing them. AM transforms him into a limbless blob with no mouth and no ability for even suicide. The final line of the story is its title.

“Why do you ask how you were created and do not seek to know why you were made?” St. Peter Chrysologus

The modest objective of the self congratulatory and elated “Singularity” variety of science and technology is to supplant completely what was formerly reserved to religion and understood through the study of metaphysics. The technocrats will define and implement our happiness, immortality, omnipotence and fulfillment through becoming one with our machines.

How we got here is a topic which will require more than a few blog posts to begin to explore, and perhaps we shall root around a bit. The history extends back not just into the technology of the late nineteenth century through today, but to late medieval philosophers like William of Ockham, then on through Descartes, Hobbes, Locke and all the rest. To understand even peripherally what ideas have these consequences is not a trivial pursuit.

John Hammond, “All major theme parks have delays. When they opened Disneyland in 1956, nothing worked.”

Ian Malcolm, Yeah, but, John, if The Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don’t eat the tourists.”  Jurrasic Park

[i] The concepts undergirding science are the stuff of philosophy.  A physical world exists outside our mind; that there are patterns which can be recognized by our senses reliably as sources of information; that we can form concepts and reason from premises to conclusion.  That causation and result are valid methods of understanding.  All of these and more are metaphysical concepts and provable through metaphysics and logic, not the scientific method.

[ii] Curiously, “singularity” is the scientific term for a single point in space-time of no dimensions, but infinite mass, which current hypothesis holds was blown up by a “quantum fluctuation” to trigger the Big Bang resulting in a inflating universe bubble in an infinite cosmos of other universe bubbles that has no beginning and no end.





Filed under Background Perspective, Culture views

6 responses to “Singularity

  1. Rita

    😦 When I read the draft of this blog, I told Jack he needed to put some kind of joke at the end of it because it was so distressing for those of us who HAVEN’T been thinking of his conclusions or the months of reading and contemplation that brought him to these conclusions. Let’s hope the joke is not on us… Yikes. I’m looking forward to the uplifting blogs to follow…sweetie! LOL as they say.

    Funny, we were at the beach last night and we were crashed on a blanket listening to the waves. There were lots of folks who had stayed late as the weather was very August like and the water was like a bath. There were some young people near us who were having fun and a loud conversation. I suddenly realized that they would occasionally speak to one another using the short hand email “words” like LOL. Sigh…


  2. Rita

    I guess I put the kibosh (?sp) on this blog post. Sorry honey… Actually it’s very thought provoking. My understanding of it has to do with man wanting to live forever. We don’t want to have children, so we have pets and since we are not replacing ourselves, we need to find a way to live forever. We have thrown out God from our daily life and without God—anything goes. And just like the communists and the fascists of old, we immediately begin to talk about eugenics, only we don’t call it that. We pass health care that will RATION services to the elderly and talk about making health care more accessible to “everyone”. The elderly are going to die anyway so why should we waste money on them?? We abort the imperfect. We, in truth, have lost all understanding that good can come from suffering, so suffering is verboten! We’ve undermined the concept of the dignity of ALL human beings and changed it to the dignity of only those humans we want. Does this not remind us of Nazism? I know…I know… We’re not supposed to talk about that or we will be seen as irrational. But history has a way of repeating itself and eugenics can fly under a swastika or an American flag with a smiley face. CAN’T WAIT FOR THE HAPPY, UPLIFTING BLOGS TO FOLLOW…


  3. I’m ordering two tylenol and bed rest for 2 days after reading this…Actually, its quite good, Jack (as usual). For some reason I did a search on “Cat Stevens” on You Tube after reading this, and found something that was very similarly toned. Of course “Cat Stevens” (Yousef Islam) probably hates “ISIS IN IRAQ”, the monsters that are driving around the empty deserts of Iraq. I was going to post an ISIS video on FB from Vice TV, but decided to post one about Jonathan Winters. Excellent work-


  4. Rita

    Thanks Mike, Jack was beginning to threaten to ban me from posting on his blogs. 🙂


  5. k

    I find it interesting that the more advanced society such as what we enjoy here in America, perhaps far less dependent on or involved in religion than other parts of the world, really does seem to provide for a better way of life. If you compare how people in other very religious cultures treat each other, blindly following their ancient religions, it ain’t too pretty. John Lennon had a good point with his lyrics in “Imagine”. Perhaps a balance of technology and religion brings better lives for all. Just hope it doesn’t go to either extreme.


  6. Marty

    Great blog!

    Interesting article about robots killing humans out of kindness. Yikes! Imagine being knocked off because a robot thought the human race would be better off without you in it!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.