“It’s been rough and rocky travelin’
But I’m finally standin’ upright on the ground
After takin’ several readings
I’m surprised to find my mind’s still fairly sound.” Willie Nelson, “Me and Paul”
[i]A quote ascribed to G.K. Chesterton may or may not be apocryphal, but it is characteristic of his honesty and faith. The story goes that the London Times editor asked some famous writers and thinkers of his time to answer the question, “What is wrong with the world?” His answer, or at least the one attributed to him, was uncharacteristically laconic,
“Dear Sir,
I am.
Yours, G. K. Chesterton.”
If indeed his, the point is clear and perfectly Chestertonian. There are other writers who have conveyed similar ideas that collide with our contemporary “I’m OK, You’re OK” widely held sentiments. Such ideas contest the other popular refrain on social media and in our understanding of what’s wrong with the world. No matter which side of the cultural divide of dueling populisms we occupy, it’s not the other tribe, and scapegoats do not let us off the hook. No, you’re not OK, and neither am I.
Father Zosima in Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov” states it this way: “Each of us is guilty before everyone, for everyone and everything, and I more than the others.” Russians, at least some of them, seem to understand this better than Americans. Quoting from Paul Kingsnorth in “Wild Christianity” in First Things[ii]: “When the twentieth-century Russian spiritual leader Father Arseny was asked, in the depths of a Soviet prison camp, who was responsible for the catastrophe of communism, he didn’t blame the camp guards, the politburo, or Stalin. ‘Among us Russian people,’ he said, ‘many have lost the faith, lost respect for our past. We lost much of what was precious and good. Who is at fault? The authorities? No, we are at fault ourselves; we are only reaping what we ourselves have sown.’”
In a final Russian allusion, I have quoted before this timeless Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn quote from “Gulag Archipelago,” “The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either—but right through every human heart.”
Lest we despond, there is serviceable relief and a solution for our burden and our troubled times, and we have known it for centuries. We have always known it. In Sermon 80, §8, St. Augustine wrote: “Bad times, hard times, this is what people keep saying; but let us live well, and times shall be good. We are the times: such as we are, such are the times.”
“She said “Well what’re you thinkin’?
I’m just a-wonderin’, is it somethin’ that I did?”
I said, “It’s nothin’, just somethin’
I picked up as a kid.” John Prine, “No Ordinary Blue”
The tragic abandonment of the doctrine of The Fall is one of the victims of the sort of utopian Pelagianism and universalism that helps inform our times. What is he talking about now?, you might ask. Pelagius was a British monk who lived around the same period as St Augustine in 400 AD. To oversimplify, he got in trouble when he overemphasized the goodness of man, free choice, and muddied the water that sin is a condition from which we need a Savior. Sin is not, as many would have it, an occasional lapse, a mishap, a miscue that a little tweaking and will power will straighten out. No Fall, no Savior. No Fall, no need for Christianity. A pernicious heresy developed that plagued St Augustine and others for centuries. Still does.
In our day we have reframed those arguments, and it goes something like this: “I’m OK, You’re OK.” I just need to be a nice guy and the bar for that moves steadily lower. “Nice” is the new criteria and bland uncertainty that sets us cheerfully free from a response to our mortality and our condition. Everyone dies and goes to a happy place unless maybe you are a serial killer or Hitler or mean to dogs, and we need not inconvenience ourselves too much over the details. If there is a god, he requires very little of us and probably doesn’t pay attention at all to our minor transgressions, especially our favorite ones.
This all came to mind a couple of weeks ago when the Sunday gospel was taken from Matthew 20: 1-16 and the parable Jesus taught about the extravagant abundance and generosity of God’s grace:[iii]
“For the kingdom of heaven is like a householder who went out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard. After agreeing with the laborers for a denarius (a normal day’s wage) a day, he sent them into his vineyard. And going out about the third hour he saw others standing idle in the marketplace; and to them he said, ‘You go into the vineyard too, and whatever is right I will give you.’ So they went. Going out again about the sixth hour and the ninth hour, he did the same. And about the eleventh hour he went out and found others standing; and he said to them, ‘Why do you stand here idle all day?’ They said to him, ‘Because no one has hired us.’ He said to them, ‘You go into the vineyard too.’
And when evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his steward, ‘Call the laborers and pay them their wages, beginning with the last, up to the first.’ And when those hired about the eleventh hour came, each of them received a denarius. Now when the first came, they thought they would receive more; but each of them also received a denarius. And on receiving it they grumbled at the householder, saying, ‘These last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat.’ But he replied to one of them, ‘Friend, I am doing you no wrong; did you not agree with me for a denarius? Take what belongs to you and go; I choose to give to this last as I give to you. Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or do you begrudge my generosity?’ So, the last will be first, and the first last.”
We certainly could infer (and should) that God will not be outdone in generosity, and our lives are adventures of second chances. What I took also from this beautiful parable is something not immediately apparent; I experienced being impelled with a renewed urgency to evangelize those I encounter and especially those I love with words and actions. How is that?, you might reasonably ask.
Two certainties arise. The first is that right until we all run out of time, the opportunity exists for not only reconciliation with God’s grace but the fullness of life within Him. For me, for you, for everyone you encounter. Think of the good thief Dismas on the cross next to Jesus. “Today you will be with me in paradise.” The second is that the workers in the vineyard so surprisingly rewarded did something. They made decisions to stand and wait for the necessary work all day. They didn’t hang out on the couch waiting for work to come to them. And then they worked.
Now, I don’t know what my work is to be today or where and when the whispers will call me to do it. But the call will come if I listen. To rely on another metaphor from Biblical thought, I don’t know if today I will be gently reminded to plant a seed, water another one, clear out a little brush around another and let in some light or merely point out that the tiny seedling is emerging. I need to be attentive to the whispers of the day.
What I do know is as the days grow shorter and colder, the leaves stop producing chlorophyll, the green fades, brilliant colors emerge, and eventually every one of those miracle leaves will brown and fall to the ground.
“Why wait any longer for the world to begin?” Bob Dylan
[i] Image from Wikimedia Commons, open source. Brooklyn Museum, James Tissot, “View from the Cross”
[ii] Paul Kingsnorth, First Things March 2023, “A Wild Christianity”
[iii] Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition


I experienced being impelled with a renewed urgency to evangelize!
LikeLike
After World War II was over there was a special prayer added at the end of Mass. The priest would announce it then he would say it and we all answered “Amen”. In announcing it the priest would say. “Let us pray for thus and so during this troublesome time.”
LikeLike
“All of this has happened before.” Cylon Number Six
““And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start, to mold a new mentality closer to the heart.” Rush
Jack,
If I understand your thesis, and it’s possible that I do not, it is that what is wrong with the world is fundamentally a collective crisis of individual accountability, caused by our refusal to look inward and our tendency to blame external groups, systems, or tribes. Is that correct? If so, here’s a brief, secular perspective.
The social climate is not an independent entity but rather a collective. It is the sum total of individual behavior. I believe that we are currently residing in a society curated by the necessities of neoliberal capitalism. The idea of “I’m Okay, You’re Okay” that you cite is an example. I’m okay, but only if I have this trinket or that tchotchke and only if I wear these brands or buy these things. (Think, “I Cant’ Get No Satisfaction, by The Rolling Stones.) The zeitgeist is driven by manufactured greed, and The Machine works to maintain the tension to its own advantage and at the expense of its consumers.
Society changes only when the individuals within it change how they live, and I believe that we are living through an era of significant potential change. People are rejecting the system, and the system is fighting for its life. What follows? Well, if history is any judge, we are entering a liminal space. The old world is dying, the new one is struggling to be born, and the outcome depends entirely on whether individuals merely withdraw from the system or actively choose to live by entirely different values. Might as well embrace chaos and enjoy the ride.
Of course, if I misunderstood your thesis, then none of this is relevant and we now return you to our regularly scheduled programing.
Av
LikeLike
Good to hear from you, Anthony. Been a long while. Glad to see are still alive and thinking out loud. As I have said before, although our perspectives are different, we agree on more than we disagree I think. Anyone paying attention knows that our times are not what we expected when we were young, and it is no wonder it will remain confusing. Perhaps we should have expected that. Pope Francis wrote that we are not living through an era of change, but a change of eras. Christendom as a culture is dead and has been dying for a couple of hundred years. Not Christianity (at least from my perspective), but the remants of the culture it engendered. I’ve written about this more than a few times.
Your vision of what the new era may look like long after you and I shuffle off our mortal coil is probably very different than mine. “On va voir” as my old friend, Father Joe McKenna in Maine would say. Speaking of the Machine, have you read Paul Kingsnorth’s fine book, “Against the Machine?” I think that and Carl Trueman’s “Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self” among some others best describe how we are where we are. Both of them are going to be at a weekend symposium entitled “Being Human” near you coming up in November. If I lived closer, I’d definitely be checking it out. Buy you some coffee. https://merelyhumanministries.org/being-human-conference/
I hope you and your family are well. Our lumberyard days are behind us, but one fortunate memory was getting to know you.
Best always, j
LikeLike
So, the pope agrees with me – or vice-versa? Isn’t that interesting. (I’m not sure if Francis is the current or previous and I’m not going to look right now.) I have no idea of what the future holds. Hell, I couldn’t have guessed the current timeline just twenty-five years ago, although I did get a few things right, hence my suggestion to embrace the chaos.
I have read Against the Machine. It was an interesting read and the author made some excellent points. It did take me a while to get through it, though, as I needed to stop and process in places before proceeding. I find the need to do that with books containing big thoughts. Took me a couple of months to get through Sapiens, but it was worth the ride. Harari is always worth reading. Another interesting book along similar lines is The Burnout Society by Byung-Chul Han. And of course, there’s always Thoreau and Emerson. Nothing like the classics, eh?
Yeah, as fellow humans we seek the same basics ala Maslow. It’s really just a matter of degrees, isn’t it? Problem is, there are always those who would use those small degrees to drive massive wedges. Welcome to the Machine.
We’re still here and glad to be so. Hope all’s well with you.
Av
LikeLike